South Oxfordshire District Council (25 003 482)
Category : Other Categories > Other
Decision : Closed after initial enquiries
Decision date : 13 Jul 2025
The Ombudsman's final decision:
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the way the Council considered a complaint about a breach of the code of conduct. We are unlikely to find fault in the Council’s actions.
The complaint
- Ms X complains the Council failed to correctly deal with her complaint that councillors breached the code of conduct during a committee meeting.
The Ombudsman’s role and powers
- We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse effect on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We do not start an investigation if we decide the tests set out in our Assessment Code are not met. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)
How I considered this complaint
- I considered information provided by Ms X and the Council.
- I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.
My assessment
- Local Authorities have a duty to designate a Monitoring Officer to ensure the lawfulness and fairness of authority decision making. The Monitoring Officer must ensure that the authority, its officers and members maintain the highest standards of conduct. Each council has different rules for dealing with complaints about code of conduct breaches.
- The Ombudsman does not provide an appeal against the Monitoring Officer’s decisions. We are also unable to investigate or comment on the actions of the councillor complained about. Where a decision has been made in line with the correct procedure, taking account of the relevant evidence, the Ombudsman will generally not criticise the decision, even if the complainant does not agree with it.
- In this case, I am satisfied the Monitoring Officer dealt with the matter in line with the Council’s rules for code of conduct complaints before deciding not to take further action. The Monitoring Officer considered Ms X’s concerns and the evidence available and explained why they did not consider the complaint should be investigated.
- I understand Ms X disagrees with the Monitoring Officer’s decision. But the Monitoring Officer was entitled to use their professional judgement to decide the complaint should not be formally investigated. As the Monitoring Officer properly considered Ms X’s concerns, in line with the Council’s criteria for code of conduct complaints, it is unlikely I could find fault.
Final decision
- We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint because we are unlikely to find fault in the way the Council consider a code of conduct complaint.
Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman