London Borough of Hackney (24 019 069)

Category : Other Categories > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 12 Mar 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council has dealt with a subject access request. This is because the Information Commissioner is better placed to consider the matter.

The complaint

  1. Ms X complains that the Council has failed to provide her with information she requested when making a subject access request. Ms X says she has complained to the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) who upheld her complaint but the Council has yet to provide the information she requested.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is another body better placed to consider this complaint. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))
  2. We normally expect someone to refer the matter to the Information Commissioner if they have a complaint about data protection. However, we may decide to investigate if we think there are good reasons. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. I will not investigate Ms X’s complaint. This is because the ICO are better placed to deal with the matter. I note that she has complained to the ICO who she says have upheld her complaint. If Ms X’s feels the Council has still failed to provide the information requested she will need to go back to the ICO and ask if it will escalate the matter further.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint because the ICO is better placed to consider the matter.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings