Worcestershire County Council (24 011 677)

Category : Other Categories > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 03 Oct 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint alleging a confidentiality breach of data and also a claim for damages. This is because the complaint does not meet the tests in our Assessment Code on how we decide which complaints to investigate. This is because it is reasonable to expect the complainant to go to court and the Information Commissioner is better placed to consider the alleged data breach.

The complaint

  1. In summary, Mr X alleges he was sacked after the Council sent his confidential query email to his employer. And also that the Council should pay him for damage caused to his car by a child (as his employer held a contract to transport children with special needs).

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We do not start an investigation if we decide the tests set out in our Assessment Code are not met. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)
  2. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is another body better placed to consider this complaint, or
  3. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant. I also considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. On the first issue: we will not investigate because the Information Commissioner - as the UK’s specialist information rights agency - is better placed to consider if the Council breached Mr X’s personal data by passing his query to his employer.
  2. And secondly, we will not investigate the claim for damages as these are better decided in the courts. It is reasonable for Mr X to take the matter to court. The court is best placed to decide if the Council is liable for Mr X’s claim.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. I will not investigate. This is because it does not meet the tests in our Assessment Code on how we decide which complaints to investigate. It is reasonable to expect Mr X to complain to the Information Commissioner to determine any breach of his data. Further only a court can legally decide if the Council is liable for go to court.

Investigator’s decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings