Torridge District Council (24 006 035)
Category : Other Categories > Other
Decision : Closed after initial enquiries
Decision date : 19 Aug 2024
The Ombudsman's final decision:
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s handling of matters relating to Mr X’s postal address on its Street Numbering and Naming system. This is because an investigation is unlikely to add to that already carried out by the Council or lead to a different outcome.
The complaint
- Mr X complains about attempts by Council staff to stop post being delivered to his premises. He says he was given false information and complains about the behaviour of officers involved.
The Ombudsman’s role and powers
- We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide:
- there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating, or
- any fault has not caused injustice to the person who complained, or
- any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement, or
- we could not add to any previous investigation by the organisation, or
- further investigation would not lead to a different outcome, or
- there is no worthwhile outcome achievable by our investigation.
(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))
How I considered this complaint
- I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council, including its response to the complaint.
- I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.
My assessment
- Mr X complained to the Council about its handling of matters relating to his postal address. It explained that prior to his February 2024 application to list his address on its Street Numbering and Naming system, it was not aware that a postal service existed to his property. It confirmed it had had no involvement in the sudden cessation of delivery to his property and suggested he speak to Royal Mail about it. It found no fault in the way the Council had advised him that prior to his formal application, his address had not been officially registered for postal deliveries. It did acknowledge that initially he had been given some incorrect planning information and said that learning opportunities would be taken with regard to staff interaction with customers.
- We are funded by the public purse and have an obligation to use the funds allocated to us in an effective, efficient and economic manner. This means that we do not investigate every complaint we receive and while Mr X may not be satisfied with the outcome of the Council’s consideration of his complaint, there are insufficient grounds to warrant an investigation.
Final decision
- We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because an investigation is unlikely to add to that already carried out by the Council or lead to a different outcome.
Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman