St Helens Metropolitan Borough Council (22 001 222)

Category : Other Categories > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 04 May 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mr B’s complaint about the Council’s delay responding to his freedom of information request. This is because it is reasonable for Mr B to complain to the Information Commissioner.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, who I will refer to as Mr B, complains that the Council has not responded to his freedom of information request made in November 2021. Mr B also complains the Council has not responded to his complaint about the matter. Mr B says he needs this information to inform his response to the Council’s Local Plan consultation.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone can appeal to a tribunal. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to appeal. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)
  3. The Information Commissioner's Office considers complaints about freedom of information. Its decision notices may be appealed to the First Tier Tribunal (Information Rights). So where we receive complaints about freedom of information, we normally consider it reasonable to expect the person to refer the matter to the Information Commissioner.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr B.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. We will not investigate Mr B’s complaint that the Council has not responded to his freedom of information request. This is because Mr B may complain to the Information Commissioner, who is in the best position to decide complaints about freedom of information. I find it is reasonable for Mr B to do this, and if needed, appeal to the first tier tribunal.
  2. Because we are not investigating the substantive matter, an investigation solely into the Council’s handling of Mr B’s complaint is not justified.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr B’s complaint because it is reasonable for him to complain to the Information Commissioner.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings