Reading Borough Council (21 010 738)

Category : Other Categories > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 03 Nov 2021

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Ms B’s complaint about the Council’s delay responding to her requests for information. This is because there is another body, the Information Commissioner, which is in the best position to consider the complaint.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, who I will refer to as Ms B, complains that the Council has significantly delayed responding to her subject access request and freedom of information request. Ms B says this has caused her physical and mental suffering and she has not been provided with the information she needs to make complaints about separate matters. Ms B would like the Council to provide the information she requested, investigate all other requests it has received which have not been answered, and make changes to improve its service.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Ombudsman investigates complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start an investigation if we decide there is another body better placed to consider this complaint. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6))
  2. We normally expect someone to refer the matter to the Information Commissioner if they have a complaint about data protection. However, we may decide to investigate if we think there are good reasons. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)
  3. The Information Commissioner's Office also considers complaints about freedom of information. Its decision notices may be appealed to the First Tier Tribunal (Information Rights). So where we receive complaints about freedom of information, we normally consider it reasonable to expect the person to refer the matter to the Information Commissioner.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Ms B.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Information Commissioner’s Office enforces data protection and freedom of information legislation.
  2. The main functions of the Information Commissioner are to uphold information rights in the public interest by promoting openness by public bodies and protecting the privacy of individuals.
  3. Ms B may complain to the Information Commissioner about the Council’s handling of her requests for information. The Information Commissioner is in the best position to consider the issues Ms B complains about.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Ms B’s complaint because there is another body, the Information Commissioner, which is in the best position to consider the matter.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings