Birmingham City Council (21 002 323)

Category : Other Categories > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 06 Jul 2021

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council sending a letter to Mr X in error, as the injustice to Mr X is not sufficient to warrant our involvement.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains the Council sent a letter to him to sign for a Disabled Facilities Grant (DFG) application. Mr X is concerned someone is using his address for fraudulent purposes.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or may decide not to continue an investigation if we decide any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement, or there is another body better placed to consider this complaint (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the Mr X and the Council, and I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.
  2. The complainant now has an opportunity to comment on my draft decision. I will consider their comments before making a final decision.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council has explained that a letter sent to Mr X about a DFG application was sent in error. It has apologised for this and assured Mr X that no attempted fraud has taken place or that his data was shared with any third party.
  2. I do not consider that any remaining injustice to Mr X is serious enough to warrant our involvement or the use of public funds. In addition, if Mr X wishes to pursue this further, then the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) is best placed to help, as it deals with complaints about the processing of personal data.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint because the injustice Mr X claims is not serious enough to warrant our involvement.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings