Surrey County Council (20 014 049)

Category : Other Categories > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 12 May 2021

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mr B’s complaint that the Council has not provided the information he requested under the Freedom of Information Act 2000. This is because Mr B may complain to the Information Commissioner, which is in the best position to consider the matter. Also, if needed, Mr B may put in an appeal against a decision notice issued by the Information Commissioner.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, who I will refer to as Mr B, complains about the Council’s response to his freedom of information request about a proposed Controlled Parking Zone. Mr B says the Council in effect shut down his request by saying the information is in the public domain so it did not need to respond. Mr B says the Council has not provided the information he requested or undertaken a review of its response. Mr B would like the Council to respond to his freedom of information request properly and investigate the behaviour of its members and officers.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. The Act says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone can appeal to a tribunal. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to appeal. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)
  3. The Information Commissioner's Office considers complaints about freedom of information. Its decision notices may be appealed to the First Tier Tribunal (Information Rights). So where we receive complaints about freedom of information, we normally consider it reasonable to expect the person to refer the matter to the Information Commissioner.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I have considered Mr B’s letter of complaint and the supporting information he sent. I have also shared a draft version of this statement with Mr B and invited his comments in response.

Back to top

What I found

  1. The Information Commissioner is in the best position to consider complaints about requests for information under the Freedom of Information Act. Mr B may complain to the Information Commissioner. Also, if Mr B disagrees with an Information Commissioner decision notice, he may put in an appeal to the tribunal for Information Rights. I find it is reasonable for Mr B to do this.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint. This is because Mr B may complain to the Information Commissioner, and if needed, appeal to the tribunal for information rights.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings