Privacy settings

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Leisure and culture


Recent statements in this category are shown below:

  • Kingston Upon Hull City Council (20 009 089)

    Statement Not upheld Leisure and culture 12-Jul-2021

    Summary: Mr C says the Council has not justified its decision to provide one fitness contract in several of its parks, Mr C is passionate there should be more variety of fitness activities available. There is no fault in how the Council made its decision, despite Mr C's strong views to the contrary. The Council will keep fitness licensing in parks under review.

  • Canterbury City Council (20 006 240)

    Statement Not upheld Leisure and culture 16-Jun-2021

    Summary: Ms Z complains on behalf of several allotment tenants about the management of three allotment sites. The Council was not at fault.

  • London Borough of Barnet (20 005 628)

    Statement Not upheld Leisure and culture 01-Jun-2021

    Summary: Mr X complained the Council failed to deal with his complaint about financial mismanagement of an allotment site. We have ended our investigation as we cannot achieve the outcome Mr X is seeking.

  • Calderdale Metropolitan Borough Council (20 004 984)

    Statement Upheld Leisure and culture 25-May-2021

    Summary: Mr X complained his local allotment association, acting on behalf of the Council, did not follow the correct process when it evicted him from his plot and refused his request for an appeal. The Council was at fault. There are no records evidencing the allotment association's decision making or actions. This led to uncertainty as to whether it followed the correct process. Mr X was also denied a right of appeal. The association has since quashed Mr X's eviction, but the Council will now review the association's procedures and monitor it going forward to reduce the risk of injustice to other allotment tenants.

  • Mid Devon District Council (19 020 748)

    Statement Not upheld Leisure and culture 20-Jan-2021

    Summary: Mrs C complains the Council failed to consult her and other hirers of a leisure centre about the decision it made to permanently close an access door to the centre. We have been unable to find fault in the Council's decision making.

  • Wokingham Borough Council (19 021 213)

    Statement Not upheld Leisure and culture 06-Jan-2021

    Summary: Mr B complained that the Council had taken insufficient action to address problems of anti-social behaviour and dangerous parking when sports matches were played at his local park. He also complained that it had not adequately addressed his concerns about flooding of his garden. We have not found fault with the actions the Council took.

  • Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole Council (20 004 042)

    Statement Upheld Leisure and culture 27-Nov-2020

    Summary: Mrs Y complains the Council failed to give her important information, affecting the location of her beach hut, before she accepted its offer of a site there. The Ombudsman has found fault by the Council causing injustice. It has agreed to remedy this by paying Mrs Y £2,870 to reimburse the costs she incurred and reflect the avoidable time and trouble its fault caused her.

  • Stoke-on-Trent City Council (19 016 130)

    Statement Upheld Leisure and culture 16-Nov-2020

    Summary: Mrs B complains about the Council's actions in banning her from two of its leisure centres. The Ombudsman finds there was fault by the Council in this matter, in its failure to conduct reviews of the bans imposed and in its complaint handling. As a result. Mrs B was caused injustice for which a remedy has been agreed.

  • Liverpool City Council (19 015 826)

    Statement Not upheld Leisure and culture 09-Oct-2020

    Summary: Mr C complained about noise and other disturbance from two large events held in a park near to his property in 2019. We are unable to find fault with the actions of the Council.

  • London Borough of Lewisham (19 016 897)

    Statement Not upheld Leisure and culture 06-Oct-2020

    Summary: Ms X complains the Council did not deal with a dispute about her allotment properly. The Council is not at fault.