Cheshire East Council (25 015 067)

Category : Other Categories > Leisure and culture

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 03 Dec 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s decision to install a noticeboard and CCTV at a local park. This is because there is insufficient injustice to warrant an investigation.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complained the Council acted unlawfully when it allowed a tenant to install a noticeboard and CCTV at a local park.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide:
  • there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating, or
  • any fault has not caused injustice to the person who complained, or
  • any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X complained the Council has allowed a tenant to breach the terms of their lease by installing a notice board and CCTV at a local park. He said the Council’s actions had led to improper use of the notice board, unnecessary surveillance and reduced his ability to access the park.
  2. The Council explained it had approved both installations and did not uphold Mr X’s complaint.
  3. Mr X wants us to find the Council at fault. The Ombudsman relies on public money to fund its investigations and so must be mindful of this when considering complaints. The injustice cited is not significant enough to warrant an investigation.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because there is insufficient injustice to warrant an investigation.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings