London Borough of Tower Hamlets (25 027 555)

Category : Other Categories > Leisure and culture

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 07 May 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s poor complaint handling. A further investigation by us is unlikely to achieve anything worthwhile.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains the Council delayed responding to his stage one and stage two complaints. He said the Council is not following its complaints procedure and missed its own deadline to respond to his stage two complaint.
  2. Mr X says the delay in responding to his stage two complaint means his concerns about the poor management of the Council’s leisure centre remain unresolved.
  3. Mr X would like the Council to respond to his stage two complaint, review its complaints procedures and offer him a financial remedy for the distress caused by its delays.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is no worthwhile outcome achievable by our investigation. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council has responded to Mr X’s stage two complaint and apologised for its poor complaint handling. It apologised for the delay in responding to his stage one complaint and it said it will review its complaints procedures to ensure complaints are responded to on time.
  2. We note the Council also acknowledged Mr X’s concerns about the management of the leisure centre. However, it also explained what steps it is taking to improve service delivery and customer experience at the leisure centre.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because an investigation is unlikely to achieve anything worthwhile.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings