Newark & Sherwood District Council (25 013 495)

Category : Other Categories > Leisure and culture

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 27 Oct 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s management of an incident that involved Miss X’s child. This is because an investigation would be unlikely to result in a different outcome for Miss X.

The complaint

  1. Miss X complained the Council did not respond appropriately to an incident at a local gym which involved her child.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide:
  • we could not add to any previous investigation by the organisation, or
  • further investigation would not lead to a different outcome.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Miss X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Miss X complained to the Council after an incident involving her child and another customer took place at a local gym. She said the onsite staff responded correctly but the Council’s written response and failure to issue a lifetime ban to the other party left her daughter anxious and upset.
  2. The Council investigated and found that whilst appropriate action was taken to address the incident including contacting the police and making a safeguarding referral, it failed to communicate that a ban issued to the customer was temporary. This led to Miss X’s child having another encounter with the customer. The Council acknowledged this was wrong and confirmed the customer had been banned for life from the gym. The Council said it would review any similar incidents on an individual basis.
  3. Mrs X wants us to find the Council at fault. The evidence shows the Council has investigated what happened and taken proportionate action. There was a shortfall in service due to a lack of communication on the Council’s part which the Council has acknowledged. The Council has ensured that the issue is unlikely to reoccur, and this is what we would expect it to do. Further investigation would not likely result in a different outcome.


Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint because an investigation would be unlikely to result in a different outcome for Miss X.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings