Hastings Borough Council (24 020 625)

Category : Other Categories > Leisure and culture

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 13 Mar 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s response to Ms X’s report of a breach of allotment rules by an allotment holder. There is no significant injustice, and we cannot achieve the outcome Ms X is seeking.

The complaint

  1. Ms X was dissatisfied at the Council’s response to several reports of an allotment holder, being in breach of tenancy rules. She said this affected her directly, because of access restrictions and other nuisance related issues. She said this made her anxious and she wanted the Council to issue a notice to the tenant to quit their plot.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement, or we cannot achieve the outcome someone wants. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Ms X wrote to the Council complaining, because it had not addressed her concerns about an allotment plot holder, who she believed was in breach of their tenancy agreement. The Council replied and set out its reasons why it did not agree, and declined to issue a notice to the tenant to give up their plot.
  2. We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint because it does not satisfy the tests in our Assessment Code, which help us decide which complaints we will investigate. There is no significant injustice.
  3. We will not normally investigate a complaint unless there is good reason to believe that the complainant has suffered significant personal injustice as a direct result of the actions or inactions of the Council. To satisfy this threshold we would need to be satisfied a person has suffered serious loss, or harm, or distress directly because of the Council’s actions.
  4. Additionally, Ms X wants the Council to issue a notice to quit to the tenant and we could not direct the Council take that action. Therefore, we cannot achieve her desired outcome.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint because there is no significant injustice, and we cannot achieve the outcome she is seeking.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings