Peterborough City Council (24 017 179)

Category : Other Categories > Leisure and culture

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 11 Feb 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s consideration of Mrs X’s representations about a local library facility. There is no significant injustice and there is no worthwhile outcome achievable by us investigating.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X was unhappy with how the Council engaged with her group, who were working to support a local library facility, to minimise the likelihood of it being closed as part of a Council restructure. Mrs X said the Council’s actions caused stress and frustration.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement, or there is no worthwhile outcome achievable by our investigation.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mrs X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mrs X complained the Council were not properly communicating in time, and attending meetings with her group, and she was concerned this would affect future decisions about which library facility it would close. The Council provided information on a recent public consultation affecting its decisions here and said these decisions were still to be made by the Council. It also said it had met with Mrs X after her initial complaint to the Council.
  2. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint. We do not start an investigation if we decide the impact of the fault a person complains about is not so significant that we should investigate.
  3. We will normally only investigate a complaint where the complainant has suffered serious loss, harm or distress as a direct result of faults or failures by an organisation. In addition, we will not normally investigate a complaint where the complainant is using their enquiry as a way of raising a wider community campaign about something of general concern but where they have not suffered injustice.
  4. Mrs X wants the Council now to take on board the views, concerns and needs of the community and I take this to mean she wants the Council to retain the library facility she is concerned about or, use it in a manner in line with her group’s views. We could not direct the Council on how it must use its resources and so there is no worthwhile outcome an investigation could achieve.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint because there is no significant injustice and there is no worthwhile outcome achievable by us investigating.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings