Kingston Upon Hull City Council (24 009 903)

Category : Other Categories > Leisure and culture

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 13 Oct 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint about the Council’s decision on the designation of changing areas in its leisure facilities. It is unlikely we would find fault and there is no evidence of significant injustice. In any case we could not achieve the outcome Mrs X is asking for.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X complained because she said the Council were not doing enough to protect women and children, because of its decisions relating to segregated changing areas in its leisure facilities.
  2. Mrs X cancelled her membership subscription because of her concern about these matters. And she now wants the Council to change how it provides changing facilities.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide:
  • there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating, or
  • any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement, or
  • we cannot achieve the outcome someone wants, or

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mrs X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mrs X complained to the Council, because she was unhappy with the Councils policy decision on how it decided who was eligible to use gender specified changing facilities. The Council responded and gave Mrs X an explanation for why it made this decision, and this included consideration of inclusivity and diversity. We will not investigate this matter, because it is unlikely we would find fault in how the Council decided to take this approach.
  2. Additionally, we will normally only investigate a complaint where the complainant has suffered serious loss, harm or distress as a direct result of faults or failures by an organisation. We will not normally investigate a complaint where the complainant is using their enquiry as a way of raising a wider community campaign about something of general concern but where they have not suffered injustice.
  3. Finally, Mrs X wants the Council to change how it provides changing areas and we could not direct the Council to do this.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint, because it is unlikely we would find fault.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings