What do complaints teach us about end of life care?

See our latest report on the lessons that can be learnt from our complaints about end of life care given in care homes and in the home.

Sefton Metropolitan Borough Council (22 003 747)

Category : Other Categories > Leisure and culture

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 28 Jun 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about comments made to the complainant by the instructor of a weight management programme. This is because the complaint does not meet the tests in our Assessment Code on how we decide which complaints to investigate. The Council has taken appropriate action in response to the complaint, and any outstanding injustice is not significant enough to justify our continued involvement.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, whom I refer to as Mrs X, says the instructor at a weight management programme made demeaning and horrible comments towards her, which made her feel fat, useless and emotionally distraught.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Ombudsman investigates complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start an investigation if we decide:
  • any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement, or
  • the Council has already taken satisfactory action in response to the complaint.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6) & (7))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mrs X, and our Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. In responding to the complaint, the Council spoke to the officers involved with the programme. They gave assurances that any comments made were not meant in the way Mrs X had received them, and they apologised for any offence caused. The Council says the team was also reminded how language can be perceived by others, and apologised for the negative and disappointing experience she had had with the service.
  2. With reference to paragraph 2 above, the Council has taken satisfactory action in response to the complaint, and the level of any residual injustice is not so significant as to warrant the Ombudsman pursuing the matter further.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint because the Council has taken appropriate action in response to the complaint, and any outstanding injustice is not significant enough to justify our continued involvement.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings