London Borough of Hounslow (21 015 589)

Category : Other Categories > Leisure and culture

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 22 Feb 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s refusal to refund the complainant’s leisure centre membership fees. We are unlikely to find fault in the Council’s actions.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, I shall call Mr X, complains the Council failed to give five working days’ notice that direct debits for leisure centre membership would restart in June 2021. He says this is a breach of the direct debit guarantee. He wants a full refund of the four monthly payments which were taken before he realised.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Ombudsman investigates complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We do not start or may decide not to continue with an investigation if we decide:
  • there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating
  • further investigation would not lead to a different outcome
  • there is another body better placed to consider this complaint

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X and copies of the complaints and responses provided by the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council’s leisure centres were operated by company A. Company A suspended payments for leisure centre memberships during lockdown in 2020.
  2. Company B took over the operation of the Council’s leisure centres.
  3. In March 2021, company B wrote to leisure centre members. The email states the centres will reopen in April and direct debits will restart in June 2021. I have seen the emails which say company B is the new name for the local leisure facilities.
  4. They also say Hounslow leisure centres are reopening. And the Council’s crest and a picture of the leisure centre are included. Therefore I am satisfied it is clear company B is the new operator for the Council’s leisure centre.
  5. Further emails were sent to all members including Mr X in April and May.
  6. Mr X says the Council has breached the direct debit guarantee because it did not give him five working days’ notice of the direct debit restarting in June.
  7. Emails were sent to Mr X in March, April, and May. The email sent in April clearly states the direct debits will restart in June.
  8. If Mr X believes the Council and company B have breached the direct debit guarantee, he had the right to make a claim with his bank.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because there is not enough evidence of fault to justify an investigation. Also, Mr X can make a claim with his bank if he believes the direct debit guarantee has been breached.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings