Stoke-on-Trent City Council (19 009 154)

Category : Other Categories > Leisure and culture

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 29 Oct 2019

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate this complaint about the library because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, whom I refer to as Mr X complains that the Council did not give notice about an upgrade to its library computers. He also says one of the scanners is defective and the software on the computers is out of date.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. In this statement, I have used the word ‘fault’ to refer to these. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint. I refer to this as ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start an investigation if we believe it is unlikely we would find fault. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I read the complaint and the Council’s responses. I invited Mr X to comment on a draft of this decision.

Back to top

What I found

  1. Mr X visits the library most days and uses the computers to do essential work. He complained that he was unable to use the computers on 16 May because they were being upgraded. He also said that one of the scanners does not work properly and that the software on the computers is outdated.
  2. In response the Council said that notices about the shutdown for the upgrade were placed next to each computer on 14 May. It said it would check the scanner that Mr X said was faulty. It also explained that it would replace all the scanners when it updates the operating system. It said it would consider increasing the software available on the computers.

Assessment

  1. I will not start an investigation because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council. The Council put notices next to each computer before the shutdown for the upgrade. It also told Mr X it would check the scanner and that all the scanners are due to be replaced. It also said it would consider increasing the software on the computers. This was an appropriate response.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. I will not start an investigation because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings