London Borough of Ealing (25 014 604)

Category : Other Categories > Land

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 18 Dec 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s decision-making relating to land it owns. There is no worthwhile outcome achievable by investigating.

The complaint

  1. Miss X complained the Council delayed on making a decision to lease her a parcel of land it owns. Miss X said she had a specific purpose intended for the land, for the use of her family, and the Council’s delays has caused her unnecessary frustration. She wants the Council to decide and for it to lease her the land.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is no worthwhile outcome achievable by our investigation. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Miss X contacted the Council in mid-2024 about the prospect of it leasing her a parcel of land near her home. In mid-2025, after a formal complaint, the Council apologised it had mis-directed her enquiry, but at that point had not made a decision.
  2. We will not investigate this complaint, because there is no worthwhile outcome achievable. Our role is to identify fault in the Council’s statutory duty or a policy failure. In those circumstances where we see a fault that has caused a significant injustice, we consider whether we can remedy that injustice. I do acknowledge the reasons why Miss X is keen to have access to the land.
  3. The Council is empowered to lease land it owns, but not under a duty to do so. Consequently, we could not direct the Council to lease the land to Miss X expects. And nor should we direct it to make a discretionary decision, within a set time frame, thus diverting resources away from its statutory duties, because it is not proportionate for us to do so.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint because there is no worthwhile outcome achievable by investigating.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings