Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council (26 003 443)

Category : Other Categories > Councillor conduct and standards

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 02 Sep 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s handling of a member conduct complaint as the substantive matter, the councillor conduct, is not within our remit.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complained the Council wrongly dismissed his complaint about a fellow councillor’s statements they had made concerning an aspect of the Council’s public spending, which Mr X said, misled residents. Mr X said this undermined his ability to properly scrutinise the use of public funds on behalf of residents.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. We cannot investigate something that affects all or most of the people in a council’s area. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(7), as amended)
  3. We will not usually investigate complaint handling if we are not investigating the rest of the complaint. This is because there is not usually enough injustice to justify us doing so. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), section 34B(8))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X alleges a councillor misled residents about public spending. This matter is not something we could investigate, because it impacts all or most of the people in the Council’s area, as per paragraph three.
  2. Mr X says because the Council did not investigate his complaint, he was unable to properly represent residents. Again, this claimed injustice relates to the residents of the Council’s area, not a specific personal injustice, and so we cannot investigate.
  3. Mr X no doubt feels personally aggrieved by the Council’s handling of his complaint, but I do not consider this represents a level of injustice that would warrant our investigating, as per paragraph four. We have limited resources and must direct them to the most serious cases.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because it essentially impacts all or most of the people in the Council’s area and so is not within our remit.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings