Central Bedfordshire Council (26 002 706)

Category : Other Categories > Councillor conduct and standards

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 07 Sep 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate how the Council dealt with a complaint about councillor conduct as it did not cause the complainant a significant injustice.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains the Council did not allow him to see, and respond to, a councillor’s comments in response to the complaint he made against them regarding their conduct in a town council matter. Mr X says this has caused him frustration.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide any alleged fault has not caused significant injustice to the person who complained. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))
  2. We normally expect someone to refer the matter to the Information Commissioner if they have a complaint about data protection/information access rights. However, we may decide to investigate if we think there are good reasons. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. I recognise Mr X says he has been left frustrated by the Council’s handling of his complaint, but this does not represent a level of injustice that would warrant our further involvement. We have limited resources and must direct them to the most serious cases.
  2. The Information Commissioner’s Office is best placed to assess whether the Council should have supplied Mr X with the information he sought.
  3. For these reasons, we will not investigate.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because any injustice caused to him is not sufficient to justify our further involvement.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings