Somerset Council (25 010 480)

Category : Other Categories > Councillor conduct and standards

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 27 Jan 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council dealt with a complaint about the conduct of a councillor. This is because the complainant has not suffered significant injustice.

The complaint

  1. Ms X has complained about how the Council’s Deputy Monitoring Officer dealt with her complaint about the conduct of a councillor.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide:
  • any fault has not caused injustice to the person who complained, or
  • any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement, or
  • there is another body better placed to consider this complaint.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Ms X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Local Authorities have a duty to designate a Monitoring Officer to ensure the lawfulness and fairness of authority decision making. The Monitoring Officer must ensure that the authority, its officers and members maintain the highest standards of conduct. Each council has different rules for dealing with complaints about code of conduct breaches.
  2. Ms X says the Deputy Monitoring Officer did not properly look into her concerns. However, even if I were to find fault with how the Council dealt with Ms X’s complaint, I do not consider she has suffered any significant injustice. Ms X has explained how she has been impacted by the actions of the councillor. However, the Ombudsman cannot investigate the actions of the councillor complained about and I do not consider the Deputy Monitoring Officer’s handling of the complaint directly caused the injustice claimed.
  3. Ms X has complained the Council shared information without permission. However, Ms X can complain to the Information Commissioner’s Office if she is concerned about how the Council handles her personal data as this is the appropriate body to consider complaints about these matters.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint because she has not suffered significant injustice as a result of the alleged fault.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings