Preston City Council (24 010 845)

Category : Other Categories > Councillor conduct and standards

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 27 Nov 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the way the Council handled a complaint about a councillor’s behaviour. There is not enough evidence of fault by the Council.

The complaint

  1. Ms X complained about the way the Council handled her complaint about a councillor’s conduct. Ms X says that the Councillor expressed their views relating to a neighbour dispute during a telephone call, and believes the Council incorrectly decided not to investigate this.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Ombudsman is not an appeal body. This means we do not take a second look at a decision to decide if it was wrong. Instead, we look at the processes an organisation followed to make its decision. If we consider it followed those processes correctly, we cannot question whether the decision was right or wrong, regardless of whether a complainant disagrees with the decision the organisation made.
  2. The Council’s deputy monitoring officer considered Ms X’s complaint. They considered evidence from Ms X, consulted an independent person, and told the councillor of the complaint. The deputy monitoring officer decided the councillor was acting as a member of the public and so there had been no breach of the member code of conduct.
  3. Ms X disagrees with the decision made by the monitoring officer. But there is not enough evidence of fault in how they considered Ms X’s complaint to warrant us investigating.
  4. Ms X also complained the Council will not investigate the dispute with her neighbour. That is a civil matter and so we would not criticise the Council for taking this position.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint because there is not enough evidence of fault by the Council.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings