Stockton-on-Tees Borough Council (24 006 117)

Category : Other Categories > Councillor conduct and standards

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 19 Aug 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s decisions on Code of Conduct complaints Mr X made against two councillors. This is because there is no evidence to suggest fault by the Council.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains about the Council’s handling of Code of Conduct complaints he made about the behaviour of two councillors involved in considering a planning application for development which he objected to. He wants the decision made to grant permission for the development to be reversed.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints of injustice caused by ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’ which we call ‘fault. We consider whether there was fault in the way an organisation made its decision. If there was no fault in how the organisation made its decision, we cannot question the outcome. (Local Government Act 1974, section 34(3), as amended)
  2. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide:
  • there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating, or
  • we could not add to any previous investigation by the organisation, or
  • further investigation would not lead to a different outcome, or
  • we cannot achieve the outcome someone wants. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant, including the Council’s response to his complaints against the councillors.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. We do not offer a right of appeal against council decisions on member conduct complaints but we can consider if there was fault in the way the council considered the complaint.
  2. We cannot question council decisions if they have followed the right steps and considered the relevant evidence and information. While Mr X may be disappointed with the decisions taken by the Monitoring Officer, having consulted with the Independent Person, that there had been no breach of the Code, there is no evidence to suggest fault affected them.
  3. Moreover, as an outcome to his complaint, Mr X seeks the reversal of the decision to grant planning permission. However, neither a complaint to the Council or the Ombudsman could achieve such an outcome.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because there is no evidence to suggest fault by the Council.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings