What do complaints teach us about end of life care?

See our latest report on the lessons that can be learnt from our complaints about end of life care given in care homes and in the home.

North Kesteven District Council (24 001 850)

Category : Other Categories > Councillor conduct and standards

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 12 Jun 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s response to a councillor conduct complaint as the injustice claimed by the complainant does not justify our further involvement, in the public interest, and we cannot achieve the outcome the complainant seeks.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X complains the Council has not taken her complaint about the conduct of a councillor seriously. Mrs X complained that the councillor had liked a post on social media which Mrs X felt was insulting about her. Mrs X says she was shocked and embarrassed by this. Mrs X wants the councillor to make a personal apology to her and to remove the ‘emoji’ they added to the post.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement, or we cannot achieve the outcome someone wants (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))
  2. When we find fault, we can recommend remedies for significant personal injustice, or to prevent future injustice, caused by that fault. We look at organisational fault, not individual professional competence. Decisions about individual’s fitness to practise or work are for the organisations concerned, and for professional regulators, not the Ombudsman. (Local Government Act 1974, s26(1) and s26A(1) as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. While I recognise Mrs X feels strongly about this matter, we will not investigate as from our perspective, the impact on her does not equate to significant harm or loss. We have limited resources and must use public money carefully. As such, I do not consider it would be in the public interest for us to investigate this complaint.
  2. In addition, we cannot achieve the outcome Mrs X seeks as we are unable to invoke sanctions on individuals at the Council.
  3. For these reasons, we will not investigate.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint because it would not be in the public interest to do so, and we cannot achieve the outcome she seeks.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings