Gosport Borough Council (23 005 177)

Category : Other Categories > Councillor conduct and standards

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 21 Aug 2023

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council dealt with a complaint about the conduct of a councillor. We are unlikely to find fault in the way the Council considered the complaint.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, I shall call Mr X, complains the Council failed to hold a councillor to account for breaching the Council’s code of conduct.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Ombudsman investigates complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We do not start or may decide not to continue with an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Local Authorities have a duty to have a Monitoring Officer to ensure the legality and fairness of authority decision making. The Monitoring Officer must ensure the Council, its officers, and elected members uphold the highest standards of conduct. Each council has different rules for dealing with complaints about code of conduct breaches.
  2. The Ombudsman does not provide an appeal against the Monitoring Officer’s decision. We can only look at how the complaint was considered. We are also unable to investigate or comment on the actions of the councillor complained about.
  3. In this case, the Monitoring Officer assessed the complaint. Following consultation with the Council’s Independent Person, they decided not to investigate the complaint as they found the councillor had not breached the code of conduct.
  4. I understand Mr X disagrees. But this was a decision the Monitoring Officer was entitled to make. As the Monitoring Officer dealt with Mr X’s complaint according to the procedure for dealing with code of conduct complaints, it is unlikely I could find fault

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because we are unlikely to find fault in the way the Council deal with his complaint that a councillor had breached the code of conduct.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings