South Tyneside Metropolitan Borough Council (21 004 589)

Category : Other Categories > Councillor conduct and standards

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 31 Aug 2021

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the conduct of a council officer outside her working hours and outside her role as an employee. The complaint does not meet the tests in our Assessment Code about how we decide which complaints to investigate.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, I shall call Mr A, says a Council Officer abused her position to gain control of a local charity. He says she is running the charity for her own self-interest and has conspired with others to expel him from the charity and mobilised a network of local government officers top personally abuse him.
  2. He wants the Council to demand the Officer to resign from the charity as part of disciplinary action.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse effect on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start an investigation if the tests set out in our Assessment Code are not met. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A (6), as amended)
  2. We cannot investigate a complaint if it is about a personnel issue. (Local Government Act 1974, Schedule 5/5a, paragraph 4, as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr A and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council has confirmed the complaint is about the Officers’ activities in their own time. It is not connected to their role as a Council employee and the Council does not consider there is a conflict of interest. Therefore, the Council cannot take any action.

It suggested Mr A contact the charity for it to deal with his concerns under its own governance procedures.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr A’s complaint because:
    • we could not add to any previous investigation by the Council
    • further investigation would not lead to a different outcome
    • we cannot achieve the outcome Mr A is seeking as we cannot involve ourselves in personnel matters including disciplinary proceedings; and
    • there is another body better placed to consider this complaint.

Investigator’s decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings