Wealden District Council (19 017 165)

Category : Other Categories > Councillor conduct and standards

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 12 Mar 2020

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: The Ombudsman will not investigate how the Council dealt with complaints about the conduct of a councillor. It is unlikely he would find evidence of fault by the Council. He is already investigating how the Council dealt with the planning application to which the complaint about the councillor relates.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, who I refer to here as Mr B, has complained the Council failed to properly consider his complaints a councillor breached the Councillor’s Code of Conduct. In summary, he believes this affected the outcome of a planning application for development near his home.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. In this statement, I have used the word ‘fault’ to refer to these. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint. I refer to this as ‘injustice’.
  2. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start an investigation if, for example, we believe it is unlikely we would find fault. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)
  3. We cannot question whether a council’s decision is right or wrong simply because the complainant disagrees with it. We must consider whether there was fault in the way the decision was reached that is likely to have affected the outcome. (Local Government Act 1974, section 34(3), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I have considered what Mr B said in his complaint and background information provided by the Council.

Back to top

What I found

  1. Mr B complained to the Council about a councillor’s involvement in a planning application. In particular, he believes the councillor’s actions led to Council officers, rather than the Planning Committee, deciding the application. He believed the councillor had breached the Councillor Code of Conduct.
  2. The Council’s Monitoring Officer considered Mr B’s complaint and decided it did not identify a clear breach of the Code of Conduct.

Analysis

  1. We do not provide a right of appeal against a council’s decision on complaints that a councillor has breached the Code of Conduct. We can only consider if there was fault in the way the Monitoring Officer considered the complaint.
  2. I consider the Monitoring Officer was entitled to decide not to formally investigate Mr B’s complaints and we are unlikely to find fault in how they did so.
  3. I am also aware we are currently investigating a complaint from Mr B about the Council’s handling of the planning application. Our investigation will consider if any fault by the Council affected the outcome of the application.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. I have decided we will not investigate this complaint for the reasons set out in paragraphs 8 to 10.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings