Rochford District Council (19 009 988)
Category : Other Categories > Councillor conduct and standards
Decision : Closed after initial enquiries
Decision date : 30 Oct 2019
The Ombudsman's final decision:
Summary: The Ombudsman cannot investigate Mr X’s complaint about a constitutional violation at a Council meeting. Mr X complains from his position as a councillor and so the complaint is outside the Ombudsman’s legal remit.
The complaint
- The complainant, whom I shall call Mr X, is a Council member and complains about a constitutional violation at Council meetings.
The Ombudsman’s role and powers
- We can only accept complaints from members of the public or their authorised representatives. This means we cannot accept complaints from councillors complaining about something relating to their position as a councillor. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26A, as amended)
How I considered this complaint
- I have considered what Mr X said in his complaint.
What I found
- Mr X is a Council member and complains there was a constitutional violation at a Council meeting when a ‘motion without notice’ was wrongly allowed.
Final decision
- My decision is that the Ombudsman cannot investigate Mr X’s complaint as he complains from his position as a councillor, not as a member of the public. The complaint is therefore outside the Ombudsman’s legal remit.
Investigator’s final decision on behalf of the Ombudsman
Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman