North Norfolk District Council (23 020 779)

Category : Other Categories > Commercial and contracts

Decision : Upheld

Decision date : 09 May 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s failure to prepare a beach hut for use and its subsequent decision to give a partial refund. We consider the Council’s apology and partial refund to be a suitable remedy to this complaint.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X complains the Council failed to prepare a beach hut for use before she paid to hire it.
  2. She wants an apology and full refund.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. If we are satisfied with an organisation’s actions or proposed actions, we can complete our investigation and issue a decision statement. (Local Government Act 1974, section 30(1B) and 34H(i), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mrs X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mrs X hired a beach hut for off season use from October to May as she had done the previous year. At end of the last season, she says she told the Council that damp was building, and woodlice were appearing.
  2. She says when she rehired the same hut the following October, it was dirty, had not been prepared and the woodlice and damp was more extensive. And the window was boarded with a metal screen.
  3. The Council offered to sweep the hut weekly, but Mrs X was not happy with this. It then offered her a full refund. Mrs X refused the offer as she wanted to use the hut.
  4. Unfortunately, Mrs X was not able to use the hut for a couple of months for personal reasons. She says when she returned the woodlice and damp was much worse. Mrs X complained to the Council.
  1. The Council acknowledges the beach hut was not prepared before Mrs X hired it. It also accepts the time taken to respond to her enquiries was unacceptable. It:
    • apologised
    • offered to sweep the hut weekly
    • confirmed the metal screen is a storm board put in place in the winter under its insurance arrangements and advised how to remove it; and
    • offered a refund.
  2. Following Mrs X’s complaint the Council offered a partial refund, taking into account the amount of time the hut was available for her use. Mrs X accepted this.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint because we are satisfied the Council’s apology and partial refund is an acceptable remedy to her complaint.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings