Norfolk County Council (21 004 806)

Category : Other Categories > Commercial and contracts

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 19 Aug 2021

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the way the Council dealt with a contractual issue. It would be reasonable for the complainant to ask a court of law to resolve the dispute. The Information Commissioner’s Office is better placed to consider complaints about information handling.

The complaint

  1. Mr Z says the Council failed to stick to the terms and conditions of a contract, and ended the contract wrongly after an investigation. He is also unhappy about the way the Council conducted the investigation.
  2. Mr Z also says the Council shared information with third parties.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)
  3. We normally expect someone to refer the matter to the Information Commissioner if they have a complaint about data protection. However, we may decide to investigate if we think there are good reasons. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A (6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr Z and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr Z, who owns a business providing services to the Council under contract, says the Council stopped funding when it started an investigation into safeguarding concerns.
  2. It is not for the Ombudsman to decide whether the termination of the arrangement was in line with the terms of the contract because it would involve interpreting the contract and relevant law. Therefore, it would be reasonable for Mr Z to ask a court of law to decide if the Council has breached any conditions of the contract.
  3. The only result of the Council’s investigation affecting Mr Z was its decision to end the contract, so there is no need for us to investigate what led to that decision.
  4. Mr Z can make a complaint about the Council sharing information with third parties to the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO). The ICO handles complaints about freedom of information and data protection.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr Z’s complaint because it would be reasonable for him to ask a court of law to consider whether the Council complied with the terms of the contract, and the ICO is best placed to deal with complaints about information handling.

Investigator’s decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings