London Borough of Camden (25 026 823)

Category : Housing > Private housing

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 20 Aug 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s failure to investigate officer conduct in relation to Tribunal proceedings. This is because it concerns matters that have already been decided by a Tribunal, so we have no remit to do so.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains about the Council’s failure to consider his complaint about the conduct of a Council officer, during Tribunal proceedings relating to a banning order application against his company.
  2. He says the officer acted unfairly and he is exploring avenues to overturn the banning order.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. We cannot investigate a complaint if someone has appealed to a tribunal about the same matter. We also cannot investigate a complaint if in doing so we would overlap with the role of a tribunal to decide something which has been or could have been referred to it to resolve using its own powers. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)
  3. The courts have said we can decide not to investigate a complaint about any action by an organisation concerning a matter which the law says we cannot investigate. (R (on the application of M) v Commissioner for Local Administration [2006] EHWCC 2847 (Admin))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant which includes the Council’s response.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council has responded to Mr X. It told Mr X it could not investigate because the matters complained about arose from, and were closely linked to, Tribunal proceedings.
  2. Mr X’s concerns relate principally to the conduct of a Council officer during banning order proceedings and the outcome of those proceedings. Whether the officer acted appropriately within the legal proceedings, and whether any evidence should or should not have been presented to the Tribunal, were matters for consideration within the Tribunal process.
  3. The complaint information shows the Council considered the complaint. But decided it could not investigate because the issues raised were inextricably linked to Tribunal proceedings. The Council said Mr X’s complaint fell outside its complaints process.
  4. It is not possible to separate out the officer’s conduct without looking at what happened during the Tribunal and this lies outside our jurisdiction. Therefore, we will not investigate.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because it concerns matters that lie outside our jurisdiction.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings