London Borough of Redbridge (25 022 799)

Category : Housing > Private housing

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 20 May 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint about poor communication and complaint handling. This is because any injustice is not significant enough to warrant an investigation by the Ombudsman.

The complaint

  1. Ms X complains an Enforcement Officer was rude and unprofessional and says she incurred unnecessary costs. She says she has decided to stop being a landlord as a result. She also complains about complaint handling.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Ms X complained that she was treated poorly by an Enforcement Officer and incurred unnecessary costs. The Council said it could have been more co-operative and apologised. It did not agree that it had caused her unnecessary costs.
  2. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide the impact of the fault a person complains about is not so significant that we should investigate.
  3. I will not investigate this complaint. We will normally only investigate a complaint where the complainant has suffered serious loss, harm or distress as a direct result of faults or failures by an organisation. I do not consider the injustice Ms X has suffered because of any poor communication is significant enough to justify an investigation by the Ombudsman. It was Ms X’s decision to stop being a landlord.
  4. It is not a good use of public resources to investigate complaints about complaint procedures if we are unable to deal with the substantive issue.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint because any injustice she has suffered is not significant enough to justify an investigation by the Ombudsman.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings