London Borough of Enfield (25 020 434)

Category : Housing > Private housing

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 06 May 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint about the Council’s actions in relation to a property which the Council uses as temporary accommodation. It is reasonable to expect Mrs X to take court action.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X complains the Council continued to use a property as temporary accommodation for a tenant for months after her property management company told the Council it wanted the tenant relocated. Mrs X says the Council then stopped paying for the tenant to use the property but advised them to continue staying there. Mrs X says the Council’s actions have caused the company financial and operational strain and wants the Council to reimburse missed payments.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mrs X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mrs X’s company allowed the Council to use the property under a legal agreement. Essentially, Mrs X argues the Council breached the agreement and other legal rights she had about her property and she wants compensation for the claimed effects. Interpreting the law about whether parties acted properly under contract or any other legal duties, deciding the results (direct or indirect) of any breach and deciding on any proper remedy, are more properly matters for the courts than for the Ombudsman. So, the restriction in paragraph 3 applies.
  2. There might be some cost to court action, but that does not automatically make it unreasonable to expect someone to go to court. If Mrs X’s court action were to succeed, she could ask the court for costs. I see no reason why it would be unreasonable for Mrs X’s business to take court action.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint. It is reasonable to expect Mrs X, or the company she represents, to take court action about what happened with the property.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings