Cheltenham Borough Council (25 025 847)

Category : Housing > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 10 Sep 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We cannot investigate Mr X's complaint because it concerns the Council's actions in relation to an individual employee and actions taken by, or on behalf of, the Council in its capacity as a registered social landlord. These matters are outside our jurisdiction.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complained about the conduct of a contractor working on behalf of the Council. He says the contractor verbally abused him while carrying out work at the block where he lives. Mr X says the Council did not deal with his concerns properly through its complaints process and instead treated the matter as an internal personnel issue. He remains dissatisfied because he believes the individual should not be working in a public-facing role and wants the Council to take disciplinary action against them.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. We cannot investigate complaints about the provision or management of social housing by a council acting as a registered social housing provider. (Local Government Act 1974, paragraph 5A schedule 5, as amended)
  3. We cannot investigate a complaint if it is about a personnel issue. (Local Government Act 1974, Schedule 5/5a, paragraph 4, as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X is a council tenant. His complaint concerns the conduct of a contractor carrying out work on behalf of the Council at the block where he lives. The contractor was acting on behalf of the Council in its capacity as a social housing landlord.
  2. In response to Mr X's complaint about the employee's conduct, the Council explained that it was dealing with the matter through its internal personnel procedures. It said it could not share details of the outcome because of data protection laws. However, it confirmed the employee would no longer be assigned to work at Mr X's block.
  3. The Council upheld Mr X's complaint about its complaint handling, apologised for the delay in responding to his complaint, and offered him £100. It also advised Mr X to contact the Housing Ombudsman Service if he remained dissatisfied.
  4. We cannot investigate this complaint because it concerns the Council's management of social housing while acting as a landlord. If Mr X remains dissatisfied with the Council's response, he should complain to the Housing Ombudsman Service, which deals with complaints about Councils when they are acting in their capacity as social housing landlords.
  5. In addition, we cannot investigate complaints about individual employees or the Council's management of its staff. We cannot direct the Council to discipline an employee or require it to disclose the outcome of any disciplinary or HR process to Mr X.

Final decision

  1. We cannot investigate Mr X’s complaint because it is outside our jurisdiction.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings