Stroud District Council (25 010 522)
The Ombudsman's final decision:
Summary: We cannot investigate this complaint about a boundary fence as the Council acts in this instance as a provider of social housing and so the matter is not within our remit.
The complaint
- Mr X complains the Council has failed to replace boundary fences between his property, and the neighbouring property, which is Council owned social housing, despite that Mr X says, it had previously agreed to do this. Mr X says this has impacted on him physically and mentally.
The Ombudsman’s role and powers
- The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
- We cannot investigate complaints about the provision or management of social housing by a council acting as a registered social housing provider. (Local Government Act 1974, paragraph 5A schedule 5, as amended)
How I considered this complaint
- I considered information provided by the complainant.
- I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.
My assessment
- As per paragraph three, we cannot investigate a council when it is acting in its role as a social housing provider. Mr X’s complaint relates to decisions about social housing next to his home, and as such, this barrier applies, and we cannot investigate.
Final decision
- We cannot investigate Mr X’s complaint because it is not within our legal remit.
Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman