Derby City Council (25 006 385)

Category : Housing > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 30 Jun 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mr B’s complaint about the Council removing his possessions from a garage he leased from the Council. This is because it is reasonable for Mr B to pursue his compensation claim at court.

The complaint

  1. Mr B complains that Council officers wrongly entered his garage, which he had leased from the Council, and removed all his possessions. Mr B says the loss of these items and the Council’s mishandling of this matter has caused him significant distress. Mr B also says the Council’s insurers are taking too long to consider his compensation claim which is over £40,000.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. The Act says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr B.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Our role is to consider complaints of administrative fault. We take the view complaints about property loss or damage are best decided by an organisation’s insurers, and if needed, the courts. The courts are in the best position to decide such disputes and only the courts can enforce an award of damages.
  2. If the Council’s insurers do not provide an outcome Mr B is satisfied with, I find it is reasonable for Mr B to pursue his claim at court. Such action is proportionate to the claimed losses.
  3. We would not normally start an investigation into the handling of a compensation claim if, as with this complaint, we are not investigating the substantive matter.
  4. Such claims can take some time to be decided and the involvement of the Ombudsman would not be a good use of our limited resources or achieve a meaningful outcome for Mr B.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr B’s complaint because it is reasonable for him to take the Council to court if needed.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings