Birmingham City Council (25 026 628)

Category : Housing > Managing council tenancies

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 10 Sep 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint the Council’s failure to resolve a leak in a neighbouring Council property caused damage to his property. This is because Mr X can take this matter to court and it is reasonable to expect him to do so.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains the Council failed to resolve a leak from a neighbouring Council property, which caused his garage to flood and damaged his property. He says the leak has caused damage to his property for over a year. Mr X complains the Council has visited his property several times, but it failed to resolve the issue meaning he has gone to time and trouble chasing the Council.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. In response to Mr X’s complaint, the Council said he could make a claim for damages. It sent him a copy of its claim form and the relevant team’s contact details.
  2. Negligence claims and interpreting the law around civil liability are generally best decided by a court if the Council does not accept insurance liability. Only a court can decide whether the problem should have been dealt with by the Council before it caused damage to a person’s property, or if it is liable to pay damages for a person’s loss.  
  3. So, I consider it reasonable to expect Mr X to follow this process, first by making a claim with Council’s insurers and then taking the matter to court if the Council disputes liability.
  4. It is not a proportionate use of our resources to investigate the Council’s handling of Mr X’s complaint and reports of leaks alone when we are not investigating the substantive matters. Any separable injustice is not significant enough to justify our further involvement. So, we will not investigate this matter as a standalone issue.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint the Council failed to resolve a leak in a neighbouring Council property causing damage to his property. This is because Mr X can take this matter to court and it is reasonable to expect him to do so.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings