London Borough of Harrow (25 006 748)

Category : Housing > Managing council tenancies

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 21 Oct 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not exercise discretion to investigate this complaint about the Council’s decision to terminate a joint tenancy when one party gave it notice to quit. This complaint was received outside the normal 12-month period for investigating complaints. There is no evidence to suggest that Mr X could not have complained to us sooner. We have no jurisdiction to investigate complaints about the management of tenancies by social housing landlords.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complained about the Council’s decision in 2023 to terminate the joint tenancy he held with his wife when she signed a notice to quit which dissolved both parties interests. He says he was made homeless as a result of this decision.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We cannot investigate late complaints unless we decide there are good reasons. Late complaints are when someone takes more than 12 months to complain to us about something a council has done. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 26B and 34D, as amended)
  2. We cannot investigate complaints about the provision or management of social housing by a council acting as a registered social housing provider. (Local Government Act 1974, paragraph 5A schedule 5, as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council’s response.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X says the Council accepted his wife’s decision to terminate their joint tenancy in 2023 which resulted in him being excluded from returning to his home. He says he has been homeless since that time and the Council has not found him alternative accommodation.
  2. We will not investigate this complaint which was received outside the normal 12-month period for considering complaints. The time for receiving complaints is from when someone became aware of the matter they wished to complain about, not when they complained to the Council or it issued its final response. We would expect someone to complain to us within a year, even if they were dissatisfied with the time the complaints procedure was taking.
  3. We have some discretion to consider older complaints in some circumstances but this would not apply to Mr X’s complaint. This is because we have no jurisdiction to investigate complaints about tenancy decisions made by social housing landlords and the law prevents us from doing so. The Council advised Mr X to complain to the Housing Ombudsman in 2023 and this is the correct body to investigate tenancy matters.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not exercise discretion to investigate this complaint about the Council’s decision to terminate a joint tenancy when one party gave it notice to quit. This complaint was received outside the normal 12-month period for investigating complaints. There is no evidence to suggest that Mr X could not have complained to us sooner. We have no jurisdiction to investigate complaints about the management of tenancies by social housing landlords.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings