What do complaints teach us about end of life care?

See our latest report on the lessons that can be learnt from our complaints about end of life care given in care homes and in the home.

London Borough of Hackney (25 025 465)

Category : Housing > Homelessness

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 06 Jul 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint about the Council’s assessment of the suitability of her temporary accommodation. This is because it was reasonable for her to use her right of appeal to the County Court.

The complaint

  1. Miss X complains the Council decided her temporary accommodation was suitable when she believes it is not. She also complains the Council did not properly deal with her complaints about the accommodation and has failed to provide her with a long-term housing solution.
  2. Miss X says the accommodation has safety risks that cannot be resolved through repairs. She says this has caused her ongoing distress.
  3. Miss X wants the Council to accept the accommodation is unsuitable, move her to alternative accommodation and provide a clear pathway to permanent suitable housing.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide:
  • there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating, or
  • we cannot achieve the outcome someone wants.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)
  3. The County Court deals with appeals about homelessness decisions.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Miss X.
  2. I also considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. We will not investigate the Council's decision that Miss X's temporary accommodation was suitable. The decision carried a right of appeal to the County Court. If Miss X disagreed with the Council’s decision then she could have appealed to the County Court. I have seen no evidence to suggest it was unreasonable for her to appeal, and therefore I will not investigate this aspect of her complaint.

Complaints about accommodation

  1. Where temporary accommodation needs repairs, residents should report these to the landlord or managing agent. If repairs are not carried out within a reasonable time, the council should work with the landlord or managing agent to ensure necessary works are completed.
  2. The Council’s review decision shows the Council liaised with Miss X’s managing agent about her disrepair complaints. Its records showed that between October 2025 and January 2026, the managing agent attended Miss X’s property on several occasions to carry out repair works. The records also show there were occasions when the managing agent could not gain access to Miss X’s property.
  3. The Council liaised with the managing agent and took appropriate action to respond to the reported repair issues. There is not enough evidence of fault on this point to justify us investigating.

Long-term housing solution

  1. The Council's review decision explained the shortage of available social housing and the housing options available to Miss X. It remains open to Miss X to pursue those options. We cannot require the Council to offer her alternative accommodation or give her greater priority over other applicants. An investigation by us could not achieve the outcome Miss X wants and therefore will not investigate this part of her complaint.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Miss X's complaint because it was reasonable for her to use her right of appeal to the County Court about the suitability of her temporary accommodation. There is not enough evidence of fault in the Council's handling of repair issues to justify an investigation, and we could not achieve the outcome Miss X wants in relation to long-term housing.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings