What do complaints teach us about end of life care?

See our latest report on the lessons that can be learnt from our complaints about end of life care given in care homes and in the home.

London Borough of Southwark (25 022 886)

Category : Housing > Homelessness

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 02 Jun 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint about how the Council have carried out work on her temporary accommodation. There is not enough evidence of fault by the Council to warrant investigation.

The complaint

  1. Miss X complains the Council have not completed repairs to her temporary accommodation quickly or to a good standard. Miss X also complains the Council have not supported her to access the housing register.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B)).
  2. We cannot investigate late complaints unless we decide there are good reasons. Late complaints are when someone takes more than 12 months to complain to us about something a council has done. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 26B and 34D, as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Miss X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. We normally expect people to complain to us within twelve months of them becoming aware of a problem. Miss X did not complain to the Ombudsman until 2026. We will consider the matters arising in the twelve months prior to Miss X bring her complaint to the Ombudsman. It would have been reasonable for Miss X to have complained about any prior matters sooner.
  2. I have reviewed Miss X’s requests for repairs and the Council’s responses over the twelve months before Miss X complained to the Ombudsman. There is insufficient evidence of fault in the Council’s response to the reported issues because the Council have arranged to inspect and repair issues within a reasonable timeframe and completed further works where Miss X reported ongoing issues.
  3. Miss X also complains the Council haven’t supported her enough with the housing register and bidding process. Information from the Council shows Miss X is in the highest priority banding for rehousing. The Council has contacted her to offer support with the choice-based lettings system and making bids. This support remains available to Miss X should she need it. Therefore, there is not enough evidence of fault by the Council in the support offered to Miss X.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint about how the Council have carried out work on her temporary accommodation. There is not enough evidence of fault by the Council to warrant investigation.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings