London Borough of Ealing (23 002 240)

Category : Housing > Homelessness

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 07 Jun 2023

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not exercise discretion to investigate this complaint about the suitability of temporary accommodation offered to Miss X. This complaint was received outside the normal 12-month period for investigating complaints. There is no evidence to suggest that Miss X could not have complained to us sooner.

The complaint

  1. Miss X complained about the Council providing her with unsuitable temporary accommodation when she was accepted as homeless in 2017. She says it failed to offer her more suitable accommodation which was overcrowded and unsuitable for a family with you children.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We cannot investigate late complaints unless we decide there are good reasons. Late complaints are when someone takes more than 12 months to complain to us about something a council has done. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 26B and 34D, as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered the information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Miss X was placed in temporary accommodation in 2017 following a homeless application to the Council. She says the flat was unsuitable for her family needs as it had an unsafe staircase for children and was overcrowded. She says the accommodation affected her mental health causing depression and in 2019 had a review of suitability carried out at her solicitors’ request.
  2. The Council upheld the review and placed her on a transfer list for an alternative property. It says it offered her alternative accommodation in 2020 but that she refused this due to personal circumstances and a further offer was turned down due to the location. In 2022 Mrs X made a complaint to the Council and in March this was rejected at the first stage. The subsequent second stage was also not upheld.
  3. Miss X occupied the accommodation from 2017until 2022 when she was permanently rehoused. She says she should be compensated for the unsuitable conditions for these years but she did not bring the matter to our attention until May 2023. We will not normally consider complaints about matters which the complainant was aware of more than 12 months before they complained to us. There is no evidence to suggest that Miss X could not have complained to us sooner.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not exercise discretion to investigate this complaint about the suitability of temporary accommodation offered to Miss X. This complaint was received outside the normal 12-month period for investigating complaints. There is no evidence to suggest that Miss X could not have complained to us sooner.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings