Birmingham City Council (22 002 158)

Category : Housing > Homelessness

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 19 Jun 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council has managed a property he lives next to. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault by the Council.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains the Council has failed to maintain a property he lives next to. Mr X says the Council has also failed to deal with his complaints about noise and anti-social behaviour from the people living in the property.
  2. Mr X says the Council’s actions have caused him distress and devalued his property.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Ombudsman investigates complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or may decide not to continue with an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6))
  2. We cannot investigate complaints about the provision or management of social housing by a council acting as a registered social housing provider. (Local Government Act 1974, paragraph 5A schedule 5, as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the @complainant @and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council is responsible for managing the property next to Mr X’s home however for the purposes of this complaint it is not considered to be acting as a social housing provider. Therefore, the complaint is within our jurisdiction.
  2. The Council has visited the property and found no structural or other repair issues. The Council has also visited the garden and found it to be in a good condition.
  3. The Council offered to install noise monitoring equipment in Mr X’s property but he declined. The Council arranged mediation between Mr X and his neighbours to resolve any areas of conflict. The Council says it was not able to identify any examples of anti social behaviour and it received no complaints about the residents of the property from any other neighbouring properties.
  4. The Council has responded to Mr X’s concerns and inspected the property, offered to monitor noise and arranged mediation between him and his neighbour. Therefore there is not enough evidence of fault by the Council and we will not investigate this complaint.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because there is not enough evidence of fault by the Council.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings