London Borough of Tower Hamlets (20 013 281)

Category : Housing > Homelessness

Decision : Not upheld

Decision date : 19 Sep 2021

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: The Ombudsman exercised discretion to discontinue the investigation of Ms B’s complaint about how the Council left her in unsuitable temporary accommodation with little support, failed to make adaptations to it, removed her from its housing register, and failed to act on reports of vermin. This is because she has withdrawn the complaint.

The complaint

  1. Ms B complains the Council:
      1. Left her and her children in unsuitable temporary accommodation with little support;
      2. Left her in the accommodation with the uncertainty of not knowing when it will evict her from it;
      3. Removed her from its housing register;
      4. Failed to act on reports of vermin in the property and disrepair;
      5. Has not credited her housing benefit account with £3,500; and
      6. Failed to make adaptations to the accommodation to take account of her disabilities.
  2. As a result, she fell several times in her home, had the uncertainty of not knowing whether she could bid for properties, and lived in unsuitable conditions.

Back to top

What I have investigated

  1. The paragraph at the end of this decision explained the complaints I would not investigate.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We can decide whether to start or discontinue an investigation into a complaint within our jurisdiction. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 24A(6) and 34B(8), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered all the information Ms B sent, as well as the notes I made of our telephone conversation.

Back to top

What I found

  1. Ms B is unhappy with the way the Council responded to her reports about a property she lived in between 2014 and June 2021. She had been homeless when the Council placed there.
  2. The problems she reported while there included:
  • No banister on the stairs. Due to health problems, she struggled to get up and down stairs anyway. She fell while using them.
  • The property was not suitable for her needs and claims the Council ignored evidence she sent in support of her request to have its suitability reviewed.
  • The Council failing to offer and provide support to her while she lived there.
  • It failed to act on reports about vermin.
  • Eviction proceedings were based on rent arrears she did not owe.
  • It would not allow her on to its housing register.
  1. Ms B emailed me to say she did not wish to pursue her complaint against the Council. Having taken account of her wish to withdraw the complaint, I have exercised discretion to discontinue my investigation of it.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. I exercised discretion to discontinue my investigation of Ms B’s complaint against the Council.

Back to top

Parts of the complaint that I did not investigate

  1. I would not investigate any of the following complaints Ms B had:

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings