Stroud District Council (25 013 361)

Category : Housing > Council house sales and leaseholders

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 28 Jan 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint that the Council failed to inform the complainant about changes to the Right to Buy discounts. It is reasonable to expect the complainant to use the alternative court remedy which is available.

The complaint

  1. Miss X complains the Council did not inform her about changes to the Right to Buy (RtB) discount which came into effect in November 2024. If she had known about the changes, she says she would have submitted an application before the discount was reduced.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Miss X and the Council, which included the Council’s complaint responses.
  2. I also considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The law allows the county court to decide any dispute about the RtB process (Housing Act 1985, section 181). Miss X can therefore ask the court to decide if the Council failed to properly publicise the discount changes, and whether it should apply the previous discount terms if she makes an application in the future. The court can make a binding order. So, the restriction in paragraph 3 applies to this complaint. As the law expressly provides this route for resolving such disputes, we normally expect applicants to use it, with legal advice if necessary. There might be some cost to court action, but that does not automatically make taking court action unreasonable, particularly in the context of a transaction for a valuable asset such as their home. For these reasons, it is reasonable to expect Miss X to use her right to go to court.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint because it is reasonable to expect her to use the alternative court remedy.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings