Gateshead Metropolitan Borough Council (25 010 418)

Category : Housing > Council house sales and leaseholders

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 19 Oct 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s failure to inform Mrs X about changes to the ‘right to buy’ discount. It is reasonable to expect Mrs X to take court action.

The complaint

  1. Ms X complains the Council did not give her appropriate support or guidance when she applied to buy her house from the Council in September 2024. Mrs X says that when it appeared she would not be able to complete the process before the deadline, the Council told her she would be able to restart the process later. She complains the Council did not tell her that the terms regarding ‘right to buy’ discounts changed in November 2024 and that if she restarted the process, it would be under the new terms. Mrs X wants the Council to let her buy her home under the previous, more generous terms.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mrs X.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The law allows the county court to decide any dispute about the ‘right to buy.’ (Housing Act 1985, section 181). Mrs X can ask the court to decide if the Council failed to tell her about the discount changes properly and whether the Council should apply the previous terms to her application. The court can make a binding order. So, the restriction in paragraph 3 applies to this complaint. As the law expressly provides this route for resolving such disputes, we normally expect applicants to use it, with legal advice if necessary. There might be some cost to court action, but that does not automatically make taking court action unreasonable, particularly in the context of a transaction for a valuable asset such as Mrs X's home. For these reasons, it is reasonable to expect Mrs X to use the right to go to court.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint because it reasonable to expect her to take court action.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings