Leicester City Council (25 004 494)

Category : Housing > Council house sales and leaseholders

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 21 Sep 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council closing Mr X’s application to buy his Council home. This is because Mr X could reasonably take court action.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains the Council did not tell him clearly enough or promptly enough that it believed there were problems with his application form to buy his home from the Council. Instead, the Council closed the application. Mr X says this means he can no longer afford to buy his home because the ‘right to buy’ discounts have since reduced.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and copy correspondence from the Council. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The law allows the county court to decide any dispute about the right to buy, except for disputes about the valuation of property. (Housing Act 1985, section 181) The valuation point is not relevant to this complaint, which is, overall, about which discounts should apply once the property is valued. So the county court could decide whether the Council was at fault for closing Mr X’s application in the circumstances. Therefore the restriction in paragraph 2 applies to this complaint.
  2. As the law expressly provides this route for resolving such disputes, we normally expect tenants to use it, with legal advice if necessary. There might be some cost to court action, but that, in itself, does not automatically make taking court action unreasonable. This is particularly the case in the context of the potential benefits to Mr X of being able to buy a valuable asset (his home) and being able to do so at a significantly larger discount than otherwise. Also, Mr X could ask the court for his costs if his court action succeeds. For these reasons, it is reasonable to expect Mr X to use the right to go to court.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because it is reasonable to expect him to take court action.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings