Leicester City Council (23 005 247)

Category : Housing > Council house sales and leaseholders

Decision : Upheld

Decision date : 25 Mar 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the valuation price used by the Council in the complainant’s second Right to Buy application. The complaint does not meet the tests in our Assessment Code on how we decide which complaints to investigate. It is reasonable to expect the complainant to have used her right to ask for a new valuation by the District Valuer.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, I shall call Mrs X, complains the Council refuses to honour the valuation obtained for her first Right to Buy (RTB) application.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Ombudsman investigates complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We do not start or may decide not to continue with an investigation if we decide there is another body better placed to consider this complaint. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mrs X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mrs X applied to the Council to buy her home under the RTB scheme. The Council accepted her application and her house was valued at £250,000. Some months later the application was discontinued.
  2. Mrs X put in a new application. The new valuation for her home increased by £25,000.
  3. Any disagreement with the price offered can be appealed to the Council asking it to obtain an independent valuation. The District Valuer (part of the HMRC) will then visit and value the home.
  4. If the Council or tenant disputes the District Valuer’s valuation of the property, they can appeal (provided they do so within 28 days of the Section 128 Notice). The District Valuer will review the valuation and make a second binding valuation. The District Valuer must again consider any representations made by the Council or the applicant.
  5. Mrs X did not appeal the second valuation. She returned the forms to continue with the purchase. However, she included a letter asking the Council to honour the sale at the original valuation of £200,000.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint because it is reasonable to expect her to have used her right to appeal against the second valuation.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings