Birmingham City Council (21 016 003)

Category : Housing > Council house sales and leaseholders

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 03 Mar 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s handling of Mr X’s Right to Buy application. This is because we are unlikely to find evidence of fault by the Council.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, who I refer to as Mr X, says the Council has tried to delay his Right to Buy application despite his confirmation that he is ready to complete.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse effect on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start an investigation if the tests set out in our Assessment Code are not met. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X applied to purchase his property under the Right to Buy process. During the process he, via his solicitors, raised an issue with the Council regarding the boundary of the property.
  2. The Council sought information from Mr X about the boundary in question. He did not respond to the query and only stated that he wanted to retract the dispute. However, as he had raised the issue, the Council’s legal team considered that it had a duty of care to ensure the proposed plans were correct and requested a response to its enquiry about the boundary.
  3. It is only recently that Mr X has responded to the Council’s query. Now that he has done so the Council is able to agree the completion and this is due to take place in a few days’ time.
  4. Delay in the process occurred because Mr X raised a boundary dispute and then delayed in responding to the Council’s queries about it. I have seen no evidence to suggest there was fault by the Council in its handling of the matter.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because we are unlikely to find evidence of fault by the Council.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings