Birmingham City Council (25 025 832)

Category : Housing > Allocations

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 25 Aug 2026

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about housing allocations. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating.

The complaint

  1. Mr X is unhappy with the Council’s decision to put him in housing band C. He says due to medical needs he is unable to use the stairs in his current home and his children are unable to visit as he lives in a house in multiple occupation (HMO). Mr X says this has impacted his mental health and has impacted his children, who are living in a hotel rather than with him. He would like the Council to change him to band A.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B)).

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X and the Council. I also considered the Council’s allocation policy.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the way the Council assessed his housing register application. The Council explained why it would not increase Mr X’s medical priority and explained what information he needed to provide if he wanted his medical priority to change. It also explained what information Mr X needed to provide if he wanted the Council to consider an additional bedroom for his children.
  2. The Ombudsman cannot question whether a Council’s decision is right or wrong simply because a complainant disagrees with it, unless there is evidence of fault. Here, the Council considered Mr X’s circumstances based on the information it had at the time of his application, and made a decision that was in line with its policy. Therefore, we will not investigate this complaint because there is not enough evidence of fault in the way the Council reached its decision.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings